The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.
The bar chart depicts the annual Gross domestic Products growth for 3 countries, Tunisia, Japan and Ecuador from 2007 to 2010 in a duration of 4 years.
Overall, as it can be seen Tunisia had a gradual decrease while japan had an increasation trend and Ecuador had a rapid change in this period.
As is given in the chart, Tunisia and japan had a different trend, downward and upward respectively, whereas Ecuador was not as same as others. GDP percentage in Tunisia was a little more than 6 in 2007 that was the most, while Japan by 2% has the smallest percentage in the same year. In the next years, Japan has a shot up by 4.1%, 5.2% and 6.3% in 2008, 2009 and 2010 respectively. On the other hand, Tunisia fell from 6.3% in 2007 to 4.5%, 3.1% and 3% in next 3 years respectively. Ecuador increased in GDP from almost 3% in 2007 to nearly 5 in 2008. After that decreased to 1.2% in next year and growth to 2.2% in 2010 finally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Jesslynindah | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Arman Mansyur | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | jenmin | 61 | view |
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate. 78
- Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate the local food produced by farmers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The bar chart shows the number of visitors to three London Museums between 2007 and 2012. 56
- The diagrams below give information about the Eiffel Tower in Paris and an outline project to extend it underground. 78
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 757.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.32571428571 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48302646143 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565714285714 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9273341884 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.625 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190972605367 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990718781158 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655642696368 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128002365869 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906401242875 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.83 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.