Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business bring about the death of local communities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Two days ago, I read an article about the quick spread of shopping centers in Karaganda region. The author claimed that this spread drives individual entrepreneurs to stop their activity in the local market. This leads one to wonder whether this stop may have a deadly effect on society. This essay disagrees with this point of view for the following reasons.
The first reason is that supermarkets provide local citizens with employment. The closure of individual business may leave many locals out of work, but supermarkets may offer them jobs. Since they need workers to maintain their department stores and deliver products to them on a regular basis, local people would feel little need to leave the area for a job. For example, many people, in Karaganda city, abandoned their decision to relocate due to the growing unemployment, once supermarkets, which replaced small business in the region, hired them as accountants, sellers, porters and security guards.
Another reason why local community can survive regardless of local business being destroyed by supermarkets is the indirect connection between the destruction of local business and local society. Even though local entrepreneurs stop their business, the local community will remain since it is also connected by other aspects of society, such as local traditions, customs, language, and history. For example, in Karaganda city, even though multinational companies eliminated their rivals in the region in 2002, regional congregations not only have survived, but also have thrived and grow in size so far.
However, some sociologists state that society will disappear along with the local business. The main reason for this opinion is that the loss of local companies will result in a rise in unemployment. Joblessness may force many people to seek jobs in other regions. Despite this, supermarkets will be able to employ all jobless people in the region to discourage from abandoning the region.
In conclusion, after analyzing, it is clear that although the spread of shopping malls may cause local business to cease their activity, there is no threat to local communities because employment is secured by shopping centers and the link between business and society is negligible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | Mariamirabella | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | shivangi patel | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | Bilal-88 | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | Mikhael | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | Mikhael | 56 | view |
- You recently stayed in a hotel in a large city. The weather was very unusual for the time of year and the heating system in the hotel was quite inadequate.Write a letter to the manager of the hotel. In your letter:give details of what went wrongexplain wh 78
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff all times, especially holidays. Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 84
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved 78
- The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advanced technology which can prevent and solve crime.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- You would like to participate in (join, take part in) a work-related seminar(IT seminar) in another country (England).Write a letter to the person in charge of the seminar and ask for detailed information regarding the dates, program, accommodation and co 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34269662921 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78056972289 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558988764045 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7056647101 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27450134 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936346529039 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794678423002 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153638182269 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640170839599 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.