The charts below shows what uk graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving collage in 2008

Essay topics:

The charts below shows what uk graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving collage in 2008

the given column graph shows what uk graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.

on the first graph describes that 17735 students strike for part-time in 2008 while 3500 graduates students did voluntary work after collage. but 29665 students are more concentrated on their future studies. 16235 students were unemployed after finishing college which is almost equal to sought part-time students

another graph shows about the postgraduate students in which 2725 students are in future studies, as compared to both graph, percentage of unemployment students are equal in 2008 where as 2535 students did the part time work after their college. only 2 percentage of students who did voluntary work with compare to graduate students in 2008. we will also notice that about third in each group were unemployed.
On the most of the graduates and postgraduates students are interested in further studies

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-21 despair 61 view
2019-06-21 despair 61 view
2019-04-13 santhoshkumar 61 view
2019-01-08 alex31425 78 view
2018-11-08 EELLeeee 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the given column graph shows what uk gradua...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...k did after leaving college in 2008. on the first graph describes that 17735 st...
^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...dents did voluntary work after collage. but 29665 students are more concentrated on...
^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lmost equal to sought part-time students another graph shows about the postgradua...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
... equal to sought part-time students another graph shows about the postgraduate stud...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...unemployment students are equal in 2008 where as 2535 students did the part time work af...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... in 2008 where as 2535 students did the part time work after their college. only 2 percen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Only
...the part time work after their college. only 2 percentage of students who did volunt...
^^^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y work with compare to graduate students in 2008. we will also notice that about ...
^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... compare to graduate students in 2008. we will also notice that about third in ea...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3137254902 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65999421532 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575163398693 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.8246301591 43.030603864 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 116.142857143 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.494605775829 0.215688989381 229% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.25117709794 0.103423049105 243% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.225356565858 0.0843802449381 267% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.358773623683 0.15604864568 230% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.224622298465 0.0819641961636 274% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.