The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving collage in 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graphs give information about what kind of things people do excluding full-time after graduate schools and postgraduate ones in 2008 in the UK.
For graduate students, the dominant type is to further study after they acquire the bachelor’s degree, ranking first with nearly 30,000. On the contrary, few people (3500) would like to do volunteer work. Unemployment and part-time work almost share the same number of graduates, respectively 17.735 and 16,235.
The situation about postgraduates is similar. Since the total number of the post-graduates is much smaller than that of graduates, the quantities of people of the four types are almost 10 times fewer. Furthering education ranks first with 2,725. Unlike graduate students, the larger rate of people after postgraduate schools do part-time jobs, which is only 200 people fewer than that of the first rank. The ratio of unemployment and volunteer work rank third and least, with 1,625 and 345 separately.
In conclusion, students are willing to continue study in both stages but may try to start waking as part-time with the increase of age due to the financial burden.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Is relating well to others more important than studying hard 63
- 17 Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem Other believe effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The graphs below compare the average weekly earnings of male and female graduates and non graduates 73
- Two floor plans 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, third, in conclusion, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25683060109 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82679026974 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617486338798 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0933476247 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151691637962 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589083919698 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570486130153 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104945957921 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068159562993 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.