In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
The impoverished members of society are facing starvation in many parts of the world despite the fact that significant advances have been invented for agriculture in the pursuit of adequate food supply. This Famine is mainly due to limited access to such technology and extreme weather conditions; However, several steps could be taken to resolve hunger.
The first reason for the poor being hungry is the unaffordable price to purchase the latest technologies used in agriculture. We can observe the farming practices without ubiquitous machinery yield poor quality crops and lower production, leading to inadequate food supply. in Third World nations such as Cambodia, Myanmar, and Vietnam, the leading countries in rice growing. These regions principally relying on manual labor in farming could hardly afford to feed all of their citizens. In contrast, affluent countries have overcome the difficulty of food shortage by incorporating innovative equipment in different stages of farming, from sowing to harvesting, which has made their productivity of crops soar during the past few decades. What has to be done to combat this matter is allocating more budget by governments to invest in these modern technologies for agriculture? If farmers can buy such machines that are subsidized, more crops will be produced to the maximum potential and, thus, be used to feed more people.
Another factor playing a part in individuals going hungry in the presence of advances in agriculture is the unpredictable adverse weather due to global warming. Ecologically, for increasing sea level, floods have destroyed countless acres of productive lands along many coastal regions in recent years. What is more, rainfall is arriving late in a few areas and has even disappeared in some regions, which leads to fewer crop rotation and dying plantations. No wonder people are starving in the middle of tens of thousands of farmable lands. As far as the solution is concerned, governments should pass laws and produce awareness-raising campaign regarding the environment within their nations and try to agree with international leaders to find remedies for global warming. If these problems are not addressed now, the future of the whole planet earth will be bleak and most nations will face famine.
In conclusion, those living under the poverty line being hungry in the midst of state-of-the-art agricultural inventions stem from the prohibitively expensive cost of such technology and unpredictable adverse weather. Only when governments invest in the agricultural sector to modify this matter and attempt to combat global warming, will starvation be lessened.
- Education should be free in all universities?Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their w 84
- In many countries people are having health problems because they choose to live a unhealthy life.What are the reasons for this?What can be done to solve this problem? 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community work should be a compulsory part of high school programmer (e.g working for charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children)To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past. Why is this the case? Is it a negative or positive development? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ion, leading to inadequate food supply. in Third World nations such as Cambodia, M...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, so, third, thus, as to, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2239.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42130750605 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98651570732 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598062953995 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.567122116 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.705882353 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2941176471 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168639426483 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481773399934 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036423932742 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962942279006 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238504564482 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.