Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject. Do you agree or disagree
Education is the right to every individual. It is considered by many that institutions should consider a balanced ratio of men and women to be admitted in every course. From my point of view , I oppose this as admissions should given purely on merit bases and certain professions are gender specific.
To begin with, universities should grant admissions on past academic records. This will ensure that equal opportunities are provided and deserving candidates will be enrolled. Moreover, student will be competitive and they will word hard to achieve higher grades at school. For instance, a female student is the best candidate for a course but it would be wrong to reject her in favour of a male student who has lower grades and qualifications. .Thus having a transparent way to select a candidate for course is essential.
However, some people believe that having a balanced number of boys and girls will provide equal job opportunities to them in future. But this does not hold true as certain profession demand either of the gender to perform. Professions like nursing consider female as they are sensitive and caring in human nature which is essential to treat patients whereas in mining industries males are preferred as it requires muscular strength. Therefore, providing admissions to equalise without looking at the capability to perform will have no meaning.
To recapitulate, despite people having varying beliefs on merits of admitted exactly the same number of gender in all subjects, in my opinion, I disagree to it as territory education should consider their academic grades and that some job demands gender wise work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-12 | Bhargav Bonthapalli | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | mananmatrix | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-21 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-13 | minhchau2205 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d in every course. From my point of view , I oppose this as admissions should give...
^^
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have given' or 'give'?
Suggestion: have given; give
...ew , I oppose this as admissions should given purely on merit bases and certain profe...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 446, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ho has lower grades and qualifications. .Thus having a transparent way to select ...
^
Line 2, column 447, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...o has lower grades and qualifications. .Thus having a transparent way to select a ca...
^^^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...provide equal job opportunities to them in future. But this does not hold true as certain...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17293233083 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85439456778 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593984962406 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4503644784 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.846153846 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136917900833 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455013976655 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341374612041 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792871908737 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00934356705709 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.