Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill
It is a commonly held belief that there is an excessive emphesise on theories and facts in the different stages of education, compared to practical subjects. I strongly believe that this statement is true and the education system should be modified.
The most commonly cited reason why the focus on academical concepts is too much is the incapability of newly graduated students in putting their learnings into practice. It is widely known that most of these students require attending over-curriculum courses in order to find a proper job since their academical knowledge does not suffice for handling real-world tasks. It is also seen that the majority of young graduates pursuing professional careers are forced to work a particular amount of time without payment as on-the-job trainees so as to acquire the skills and experience needed for those careers. If learning theories and facts were enough, these individuals would not have to go through this stiff condition to be recruited.
More importantly, surviving the challenging life and roughly competitive job market of this modern world demands essential life skills which unfortunately lack in school or university curriculum. Beside learning highly complex scientific theories, students should be taught teamworking, instant decision-making, and crisis management which are all vital for dealing with their later-life obstacles. Individuals who are not capable of positive cooperation, creative thinking, or use their intuition for completing given objectives will be either constantly on the verge of redundancy or remained as a low-ranking employee for the rest of their lives. Such invaluable skills should be cultivated during school and upper-school period.
In conclusion, I firmly hold the view that education systems are focusing too much on academical subjects rather than practical skills, and this can threaten the pupils future as such skills are imperative for achieving prosperity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | sanjugohel | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Tejwani | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | Tejwani | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in the past are more interested in improving their neighborhood (the area where they live) than now. 79
- do you agree or disagree with this statement? sometimes people think nowadays the media are less concern about the accuracy of news than in the past 76
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events.Do you think this is positive or negative development? 84
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events.Do you think this is positive or negative development? 84
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 539, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... without payment as on-the-job trainees so as to acquire the skills and experience neede...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57718120805 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03875690235 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644295302013 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.4064896469 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.090909091 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17046903893 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619719188765 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443990267014 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935530587946 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192057122215 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.