The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
The diagram illustrates the number of tourist tripping through the best airports in New York City, in 5 years since 1995. Overall, there are three often-used airports. The LaGuardia had the most significant peak in a half-decade, a similar pattern can be noticed for John F. Kennedy and Newark airports, which had inconsiderable rise.
According to the data, the John F. Kennedy’s airport had rapid growth. It was nearly 25m in 1995, and by 1997 the number was well over 40m. The following were LaGuardia and Newark, just under 40m and around 39m by 1997 respectively.
For the second period, which had continued from 1997 to 2000, Newark had frozen on the about 41m. As for, LaGuardia, it rocketed to about 69m by the and of the period. Most weird results were for John Kennedy's airport, the trend reduced to approximately 31m, then went to 45m.
- Modern technology now allows rapid and uncontrolled access to and exchange of information. Far from being beneficial, this is a danger to our societies. 56
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 61
- Most schools offer some type of physical education program to their students. Why is physical education important? Should physical education classes be required or optional? 78
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in rented and owned accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to approximately 31m, then went to 45m.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, then, well, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 710.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 146.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86301369863 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47606760199 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73406950315 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.671232876712 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 196.2 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7120212679 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.5454545455 112.824112599 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.2727272727 22.9334400587 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135413321509 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502182502925 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653943642148 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913276552631 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527325233474 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.02 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 5.0 11.0658536585 45% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.