The proliferation of private cars on the roads in many parts of the world has led to serious problems of pollution and may contribute to global warming. Some people think that governments should spend money for the development of public transportation systems in order to help alleviate this problem. Others think it is better to spend money for the development of electric and other types of cars that may cause less pollution.
Do you think it is better for governments to spend money developing public transportation or developing new kinds of cars?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In modern times, Populations increased day by day and it positively affect to the pollution. Due to increase in numbers of people usage of technology and other things which are main source of pollution. In this topic some people think that government should spend some money on public transport than others believe that they should use that money for development of electric and other types of cars. I thought the authority spend money on public transportation and my supportive points is discuss below.
First of all, I would like to talk about population. It means rise in numbers of people is leads to expansion of pollution. For example if population access they use more and more personal vehicles to go outside or work place. So governments should be developed the public transport and not on the cars and bikes. It's helpful to all because in a single bus more than thirty people can travelled while in case of personal vehicle only two or three people travelled. Another thing is that public transport is cheaper than the others and provide basic facilities.
Secondly, remaining are thought that government should more focused on electric cars but is increase the cost of people also it helpful to Some extent. Say for government transport is not running at proper time, due to this people reached late at their work place . So very less humans prefer to travelled by public sector transportation.
To sum up that, pollution is occurs in both way but I think that environment is less polluted in case of public transport compared to private vehicles. Thus I support to the government should spend some money on public transportation than electric and other types of cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-27 | m_sepahi@ymail.com | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-03 | stanie calitex | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | cindycornelia98 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | cindycornelia98 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | cindycornelia98 | 56 | view |
- The proliferation of private cars on the roads in many parts of the world has led to serious problems of pollution and may contribute to global warming. Some people think that governments should spend money for the development of public transportation sys 56
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choice on everyday matters (such as food,clothes and entertainment) is likely result in a society of individual who only think about their own whishes. Other people believe that it is important 73
- In Recent Years Many Local Shops Have Closed Because Customers Travel To Large Shopping Malls 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
... increased day by day and it positively affect to the pollution. Due to increase in nu...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 490, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'discussed'.
Suggestion: discussed
...nsportation and my supportive points is discuss below. First of all, I would like...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... supportive points is discuss below. First of all, I would like to talk about...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...others and provide basic facilities. Secondly, remaining are thought that gov...
^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t is not running at proper time, due to this people reached late at their work place...
^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... people reached late at their work place . So very less humans prefer to travelled...
^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun humans is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ched late at their work place . So very less humans prefer to travelled by public se...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...led by public sector transportation. To sum up that, pollution is occurs in b...
^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...transport compared to private vehicles. Thus I support to the government should spen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, another thing, for example, i think, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94366197183 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69449012028 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524647887324 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6100168442 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310595972076 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103967138573 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949055527971 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205350952554 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538694608354 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.