The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by cecilia on Mon, 04/22/2019 - 05:02

The pie charts compare the percentages of different types of sources used to produce electric energy in France and Germany in 2009. At a first glimpse, it’s evident that while the most used German source was by far conventional thermal, both nuclear and hydroelectric energies supplied the highest amount of electricity in France.

The first pie charts illustrate that overall, conventional thermal and nuclear supplied the highest amount of energy while renewable sources accounted only 17,4% and 13% in Germany and France respectively.
In detail, the second pie charts describe percentages of electricity produced by 4 renewable sources- biomass, hydroelectric, wind and solar: in detail, in Germany biomass and wind energy sources represented more than two-thirds of the total, accounting 39,3% and 36,9% respectively whereas France reported a marked production of Hydroelectric energy, assessed around three-quarters of the whole electricity produced by renewables.

In conclusion, the pie charts highlight that both the 3 countries are provided with the highest amount of electricity by non-renewable sources of energy.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-25 benj212 56 view
2019-12-30 Vrajesh 73 view
2019-12-30 Vrajesh 61 view
2019-11-12 Siva69 73 view
2019-04-22 cecilia 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user cecilia :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, whereas, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81437125749 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15178319619 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550898203593 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 107.088001195 43.030603864 249% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 194.2 112.824112599 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 5.23603664747 225% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242851467897 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154015013654 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638798134896 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160784941158 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00426153617343 0.0819641961636 5% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.6 13.2329268293 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 61.2550243902 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.01 11.4140731707 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.