Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Before tendering my opinion, I guess it’s crucial to take quick glance on this argument on both sides. Some people hold the view that having farmland, housing, and industry are much important for living. But, other prefer keeping land for animals that might be extinct in the future. I concur with the first group of people whose assert that human needs farmland, homes, and factories for living nationwide. Because of several reasons I will explain why I subscribed that attitude to elaborate cogently in the subsequent paragraphs.
First reason coming to my mind consolidate my stand point is people nowadays are inquir a lot of issue in different aspect regarding our life. People may need farmlands to grow up for instance their own crops and getting their fresh food for their daily routine and getting more experience and skill in many kind of agriculture. And that will impact their health in such a good way definitely. Without any doubt, every person in this earth have to get his home for living with their family members to build their futures with a lot of thrives and prosperity and to spend an amusing time together.
Second reason I need to give it some attention is that industry considered one of the essential aspect in our societies. Plethora of studies poses that the first generation countries depended on their factories to improve their economical, and political level as well. In contrast to other poor countries which they still struggling with different kind of famine and that just influence their standard of level in negatively ways.
Additionally, theories claimed that people becoming more dependent by using a lot of farmlands in this era. And that will lead to diminish the desert and drought lands all around the world. To let the majorities of land on this earth become fertile. Another advantage of having more farmlands is affecting the global warming phenomena and getting more oxygen which considered the most important element for living in this earth.

To put it in brief, I strongly agree that getting farmland, housing, and factories are much important than keeping that lands for animals will disappeared in the next up-coming future. To make the life easier and more convenient than few decades ago. In a nutshell, in fact, there are multiplicity of other factors supplementing the aforementioned statements, which could be alluded here, but are not embraced due to the dearth of time

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-20 Dimitrina 60 view
2019-12-21 Manu2525 70 view
2019-12-06 bishoy 76 view
2019-11-07 MOHD ARAFAT 76 view
2019-11-07 MOHD ARAFAT 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Malaak :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun kind seems to be countable; consider using: 'many kinds'.
Suggestion: many kinds
...nd getting more experience and skill in many kind of agriculture. And that will impact th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 144, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'disappear'
Suggestion: disappear
...han keeping that lands for animals will disappeared in the next up-coming future. To make t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e not embraced due to the dearth of time
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, still, well, for instance, i guess, in brief, in contrast, in fact, kind of, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04702970297 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61416491449 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559405940594 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9145078943 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.315789474 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.10526315789 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296229686789 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850359929767 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711676028437 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157918873945 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755219735712 0.0645574589148 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.