It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.
What are advantages and disadvantages of this development?
The increasing development in the field of technology and scientific mobility has allowed people to visit extreme places such as south poles, rain forest and many more. Although this allowed them to reach greater heights of expertise but also initiated some concern about the damage produced to the natural environment. This essay will showcase both the side of impacts produced by such events.
Exploring new places is a common mind frame for a hardcore tourist. Visiting such places enables them to experience different condition and scenario. Moreover, from a researcher side, this empowers them to learn about the wide diversity and reasons behind the existence of life on the earth. For instance, German scientist, Christian Michael spent 8 years in wildlife, far away from the cities and modern conditions, just to understand the physical behavior of ants in their own colonies. However such areas initially cut off from all thing but result in a detailed version of each thing in the raw form which can be used to produce more accurate findings in the future.
On the other hand, checking such places has always been a hot debatable topic because from a general perspective where ever human visit they tend to destroy its natural habitat. No matter, how strict the rules have governed the transition of state does not need much time. Additionally, scheduling such things demands high-cost of equipment and training, which is often out of reach for a middle man. Furthermore, there is always a constant risk to life due to the unavailability of communication facilities and emergency help. Such cases have already occurred in the Amazon rain forest, wherein Richard Cary, a professional swimmer drowned in the river, due to lack of knowledge and misguided directions.
To sum up, no one can deny that 21st-century advancement has made people capable to uncover many areas for tourist and scientist, but unfortunately, such movements have pulled down the vegetation and natural domain.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-08 | neethujithin | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Jonkun | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | Mr.Strange | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-29 | vinusharma27 | 89 | view |
- Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge o 89
- In the 21st century, the ease of traveling to any part of the world has been increased, which certainly has inclined people to create a mindset that countries having people from different nationalities are able to be more developed than the other. I total 56
- With the increased global demand in oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources. To what extent do you agree? 89
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honor, kindness, and trust, nA person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessio 73
- Some people believe that children s time outside of the school be filled with other activities such as music art and sports Others feel that children should spend time relaxing at home To What extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...behavior of ants in their own colonies. However such areas initially cut off from all t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, as for, for instance, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19814241486 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76099550288 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653250773994 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0574175816 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.928571429 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189249921194 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05708688439 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379670719101 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113938014543 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345024445702 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.