Some cities have vehicle - free days, when private cars, trucks and motorcycles are banned in the city centre. Public transportation like buses, taxis and metros are advised. To what extent do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Pollution and traffic jams have become a pestering problem in many urban areas around the world. Thus, vehicle-free days are introduced to give way to public transport, although this approach remains a controversy. This essay will highlight the merits and drawbacks of this approach before representing my own opinion.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that banning private cars and motorcycles poses several negative impact on individuals and public transportation. A significant point is that buses, undergrounds and trains are nowhere as convenient as private vehicles. To specify, it takes a long time for passengers to hustle in the crown for a seat and arrive at the destinations after a variety of stops. In addition, this method poses a pressure on public transports, which affects the speed and services. According to some recent studies, the figure of train and bus commuters rises by 35 percent on vehicle-free days in some city centres. As a result, public vehicles and terminals are overloaded, leading to the commuters’ displeasure.
On the other hand, increasing the frequency of using public transports is inevitably beneficial to the environment and the whole society. Firstly, since vehicle is the primary contributor to the local pollution, they should be discouraged. To be particular, by this way, there would be a sharp fall in the amount of dust, toxic waste released including carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide and gas into the air. Therefore, local warming is reduced and the public health is strengthened, as citizens are less vulnerable to asthma and lung cancers. Secondly, taking buses and light rails is more secure than driving not only in terms of vehicle safety, but also with regards to driving habits and training of operators. Transit operators receive more training on the regular basis than the average automobile drivers. Statistically, bus - and - train related accidents happen at the lower rate than car travel does.
All in all, despite several obvious detriments, I firmly believe that the advantages of public transport outweigh the disadvantages. Moreover, it may be a wise practice since all the inefficiency and passenger discontent would be addressed, provided the government offers grants to public transportation infrastructure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-03 | Jenny213987 | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | Jenny213987 | 11 | view |
- some countries there is is insufficient recycling of waste materials (eg paper, glass and cans). What are the reasons and solutions? 73
- IN order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advs and disadvs of such a solution 78
- In most countries, prison is an effective solution for the problem of crime. Some people think it is a more effective solution to provide a better education. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many people believe that the current system of both teachers and students in the classroom will no longer exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree with this opinion 79
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng to the commuters' displeasure. On the other hand, increasing the freque...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41899441341 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0938559185 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634078212291 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7788888667 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165390248829 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457543468845 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440050804244 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920307887481 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460807393738 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.