7. Some people think that the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them how much they produce and sell. Do you agree or disagree ? Include any relevant examples based on your knowledge and experience.
Some society sectors believe that having salaries and pays according to productivity and sales figures is the most effective and motivating way to promote hard work. I strongly agree with pays based on productivity and in this essay, I will expose some reason why I believe this would be effective to promote hard work.
Firstly, it is true that work stimulus has a relevant correlation in the employees' productivity, furthermore, work motivation depends on many factors such as work recognition, positions promotion, etcetera. however, when we talk about work motivation, is hard to avoid the topic "salary", because money is the incentive that our capitalist society promotes as a work rewards, this means, if people do not receive a fair salary according to their efforts, they will feel unsatisfied and as a result, their productivity will decrease. For instance, in my last job, the Human Resource department performed a survey in the company, and the results showed the majority of the employees thought that their salaries are far lower than the pay they deserve, furthermore, the company noticed that the large numbers of these employees were found in the areas where the company had productivity inconveniences.
Secondly, the theory that "the big piece of cake is for the good guy" works. most of the companies set ranks of salaries for employees according to the positions, education or work experience, honestly, it could be inaccurate, especially when experienced people show lower results than others with more discrete backgrounds or position in the company. if companies set ranks of salaries depending on the results, the employer will encourage everyone to achieve goals, for example, most of the sales departments in companies, have a level of commissions for sales, the sales representative with lower sales will have the poorest salary. In addition, most of the people are moved by money and salaries are the best incentive to make the workers produce more and better.
To conclude, companies have to set a ranking of salaries according to the background, however, it does not guarantee the productivity of the worker, in fact, I truly believe that the most effective way to promote and encourage the employees to improve their productivity is giving them targets, and stimulating them by salaries according to their goals achieved. All of this could work with a strategic plan of goals and incentives set by the company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-04 | davidlvg1108 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-27 | Caturwibowo023 | 56 | view |
| 2018-12-27 | Ferry Yuda prasetyo | 56 | view |
- Many people today use their mobile phones for sending texts more than talking What are the reasons for this Are there more advantages than disadvantages 84
- In general, people do not have such a close relationship with their neighbours as they did in the past. Why this so, and what can be done to improve contact between neighbours? 67
- Essay topics: You work for an international company. You have seen an advertisement for a training course which will be useful for your job.Write a letter to your manager. In your letter:Describe the training course you want to doExplain what the company 56
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.Discuss both these views and give your own o 56
- You have gained admission in a prestigious college. Now you have to arrange for the accommodation. Write a letter to the college stating your likes and dislikes in the choice of food and accommodation. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...mulus has a relevant correlation in the employees productivity, furthermore, work motivat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...gnition, positions promotion, etcetera. however, when we talk about work motivation, is...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Most
...f cake is for the good guy' works. most of the companies set ranks of salaries ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...backgrounds or position in the company. if companies set ranks of salaries dependi...
^^
Line 10, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...panies have to set a ranking of salaries according to the background, however, it...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, honestly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2082.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25757575758 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99923467434 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494949494949 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 654.3 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.2975951904 177% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.266606637 49.4020404114 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 189.272727273 106.682146367 177% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 20.7667163134 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0909090909 7.06120827912 200% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165770502644 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717617470905 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475200216295 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107473894901 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420958436472 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.3 13.0946893788 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.48 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.1190380762 162% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.