Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?
Whether the authorities or the private sector should be solely responsible for researches in science has caused a heated debate. In my view, those projects should be, by far, better funded and supervised by the state for the reasons I will outline below.
First, it seems that only government possesses sufficient resources, including human, finance and cutting-edge facilities, to carry out scientific research. The fact that these schemes require a great deal of investment, which may be beyond the individual’s capacity is undeniable. The Moon space exploration, operated by NASA, which would have not been an enormous success without the huge support from governments in the global scale, would serve as an excellent example.
Second, the authorities, who may be more influential, could get a wide range of scientific innovations effectively applied in daily lives. This is because they, as national leaders, could issue polices and regulations to attract enough attention from the public as well as relevant actions. Considering environmental degradation, scientist have been putting a lot of efforts in devising eco-friendly appliances, for instance, but this project will be wasteful if there are any restriction on using unrenewable energy and policies with an aim to raising the public’s awareness.
Granted, there is no doubt that private organizations have made considerable contribution to researching and developing technology and science, such as Clean Vegetation project or VinEco by Vingroup, which is designed to encourage citizens to consume food superior to their health. Nevertheless, these circumstances are few.
In conclusion, it is my belief that the government should play primary role in controlling and conducting scientific investigations rather than private companies due to its greater resources and influence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | ketan | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | trongduong96 | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | khietquynh2402 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Yui | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Habui | 61 | view |
- In modern societies, it is possible for people to go shopping, work andcommunicateviatheinternetwithoutface-to-facecommunication.Isitapositiveornegativedevelopment 89
- Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources.Do you agree or disagree? 89
- We can get knowledge from news, but some people think we cannot trust the journalist. What do you think? What qualities do you think a successful journalist should have? 89
- The graph below shows the population of particular country by age group starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 79
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills.To what extent you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to raising the public's awareness. Granted, there is no doubt that private ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70397111913 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25312626274 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.70036101083 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.5677561984 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.636363636 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1818181818 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236499474896 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762877721941 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759996806863 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120906347993 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716162307587 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.