The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The figure depicts information about the various means of transportation preferred by the computers to travel to and from their job of a European city in Percentage in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
In an overview, it can be noticed that, peoole preffered private mode of transportation more in later year as oppose to the public vehicles.
As can be depicted from the figurevthat car which was the least used vehicle in the initial year rocketed from around 6 percent to 38 percent in the final year. Similarly erratic trend can be seen in case of train, which was around 18% in 1960 , it reached at its peak level of 28% in 2000 and declined slowly at around 22% in 1980.
On the other hand, bus, which was the most preffered means for traveling in 1960 slumped from about 39% to 15% in 2000, a decrease of about 24% in 40 years.As for tube, the trend remained almost constant at about 22% in the given period of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-21 | Sai sushma | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-09 | Sukeerty | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-13 | binita karki | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-09 | Minh Pham | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-07 | faruke | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information about global sales of games software, CDs and DVD or video. 61
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade - labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Uk graduates and postgraduates students who did not go to full-time work after leaving college in 2008. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: AS_OPPOSE_TO_AS_OPPOSED_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as opposed to'?
Suggestion: as opposed to
...de of transportation more in later year as oppose to the public vehicles. As can be depict...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... year as oppose to the public vehicles. As can be depicted from the figurevthat ca...
^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ercent to 38 percent in the final year. Similarly erratic trend can be seen in case of tr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e of train, which was around 18% in 1960 , it reached at its peak level of 28% in ...
^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...00, a decrease of about 24% in 40 years.As for tube, the trend remained almost con...
^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...most constant at about 22% in the given period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 749.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48502994012 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48885696929 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610778443114 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.6841701599 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.8 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185770082047 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103879631457 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704322712405 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116722759754 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740955538558 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.36 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.