The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The supplied line graph illustrate the carbon dioxide (CO2) emission per metric tonnes in four europian countires from the year 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it can be seen that UK produced the most among the 4 nation over the period although it fell slightly. The amount of CO2 emitted per person was markedly the least in sweden while the level rose steadly in both Portugal and Italy.
First of all, UK and sweden had the highest emission of CO2 per person in the year 1967 with around 11 and 9 tonnes respectively. However, Sweden experienced and increase to reach near the same amount of UK in the year 1977 and then dropped steadily to reach just below 6 tones by the end of the period while UK droped to 9 tones approximetly.
In contrast, there was a significant increase on the level of Co2 emitted by Portugese and italian over the period of 40 years.Italy almost doubled the figure, making it the second highest emitter by 2007 while Portugal’s figure roses more dramtically by 5 tones per person and equaled with sweden.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, 56
- Percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Italy
...and italian over the period of 40 years.Italy almost doubled the figure, making it th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, then, while, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71978021978 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56325011994 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.8194088902 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.166666667 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 5.23603664747 223% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298673247675 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147030090168 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974330881718 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181181651391 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636921573669 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.