In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Nowadays, although there have been many signs of progress in the field of agriculture, numerous people in the world still have to suffer from starvation. Personally, I believe that the main causes of this phenomenon are overpopulation and climate change and it is possible to address this problem by education and collaboration policies.
There are two main culprits that lead to famine in many countries. Firstly, the boom in population is becoming more and more common in several countries in the world, especially those who are poor. This is because the continued rise in population results in greater demands for food and the development of agriculture cannot catch up with the requirement of residents. For example, these days, in some developing countries like India, despite the advances made in farming, the rapid growth of population makes it difficult for the agriculture to provide enough food for all citizens of the country. In many rural areas, millions of people were killed by famine every year. Additionally, climate change is also responsible for rising global hunger. Natural disasters have been undermining several efforts in agriculture. Take an example in some extreme weather events like land degradation and water scarcity, in Africa, it had not been rained for years, which makes it impossible for farmers to grow any crops. Consequently, they had to deal with food shortage in the coming years. Obviously, dramatic population rise and climate change are the two main reasons for this issue.
However, this problem can still be tackled if some measures are taken seriously and instantly. First of all, governments should educate citizens about the necessity of family planning. With a better understanding of the population, people will be more aware of giving birth. For instance, the Chinese government have brought in population policies in recent years to notify its residents of giving birth effectively with only one child per family. And now they finally succeed in taking over their population. Secondly, rich countries should help the poor countries in dealing with the consequence of natural disasters and also share agricultural technology.
In conclusion, overpopulation and climate change are the two main causes of the food shortage in today’s world, which can be solved by education and the support of developed nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | aria etemadi | 56 | view |
- Topic: Employers should give their staff at least a 4-week holiday a year to make employees better at their jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The three pie charts show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- In today’s world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot? 61
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon. 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35561497326 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87397336408 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564171122995 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8329406807 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.421052632 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177746069883 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536437715271 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582154553604 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119897387465 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538109473501 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.