Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive.
Do you agree or disagree ?
It universally acknowledged that, extent of socializing with the advancement in technology, is one of the most contentious issues these days. It is thought by many that discovery of electronic gadgets is creating distance among people in the society. This essay will disagree with the statement and deeply analyze why this believe is not supported and render the best verdict out of it.
Firstly, world has become a global village with the advent of devices. Nowadays, people are closer to each other than they were ever before, because everyone is reachable on just a single click. In other words, this discovery had made possible to talk to a friend or family who living in any part of the world. A succinate example proclaiming this, In UK a survey was conduct as review on these inventions, people express that they are living in a fast paced world and it is nearly impossible to pay visit to relative and friend, whereas these devices keep bond between relationship strong and keep in touch with others.
Secondly, electronic devices has made business possible from home. Individuals can run their business from home and it does not affect client or customer relationship, hence one can spares more time for friends and family circle to replenish. For illustration, an entrepreneur experienced that technology had made his life much easier as compared to the past when he had no social life at all, now he has time to spend with others and it does not affect his business. Additionally, people can share many ideas with their social group relevant to their profession which expand their horizon and help each other in many ways.
To conclude, this essay argued that, smart-devices bring people closer from all around the world, and made life more facile leaving plenty of time for interaction with social circle. I disagree with the statement that smart-devices are segregating man from the society.
- The system used for rubbish/garbage collection in your local area is not working properly.This is causing problems for you and your neighbours.Write a letter to the local council. In your letter1.Describe how the rubbish collection system is not working p 89
- Some people think that libraries are a waste of resources and money so computers should replace them. However, others do not agree.Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Some people believe that the only purpose of a zoo is entertainment.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- You successfully passed a job interview. You are expected to start on November 15, but you will not be available on that date.Explain the situationExpressing your concernSuggesting a solution 64
- Planting trees is very important for the environment.Some people say trees should be planted in the vacant areas of cities and towns,while other says housing facilities should be built instead.Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...e statement and deeply analyze why this believe is not supported and render the best ve...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'spare'
Suggestion: spare
...or customer relationship, hence one can spares more time for friends and family circle...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...echnology had made his life much easier as compared to the past when he had no soc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03144654088 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68813301303 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.283488268 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.076923077 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113856728924 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393147535224 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325790144596 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738144863382 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170964032905 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.