The bar chart gives information about the percentage of workers in different sectors of employment in three countires at different stages of economic development.
The bar diagram shows information about the percentage of people who work in different sphere of work in three countries at varied level of economic development. Overall, Japan, Brazil and India are compared in sectors such as: agricultural, industrial and service measured in percentage.
Firstly, India in the agricultural sector has 60%, but in industrial has only 10% and in service sector around 25%. Secondly, Brazil's strength is in the service sector with around 50%, but in the industrial and agricultural sectors the country share equal percentage which is around 25%. Thirdly, but not in the last place is Japan. For unfortunately japanese's workforce in agricultural sector is only 5%. However, in the service sector reach around 60% and the last sector is industrial which is more than 30% and it is more than the others countries in the formentioned sectors.
In summary, Brazil is with the best percentage about distribution of employment by sectors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-16 | Martin9604 | 75 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 61
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists 56
- In some countries people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing and starting university studies. 56
- The figure gives information about smoking habits of the UK population by age 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, third, thirdly, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25806451613 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94836592073 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522580645161 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.965959347 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225935557055 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094214245481 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101054682707 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169828649828 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087903895529 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.