The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and
vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and
2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the changes in price of different food product groups from 1978 to 2009.
It is noticeable that despite fluctuations, the prices increased for all three groups over the period shown. However, only the increase in the prices for fresh fruits and vegetables was higher than the consumer-price index.
All the lines on the graph have the same starting figures. The consumer-price index rose steadily from about 70 in 1979 to just over 200 at the end of the period. Likewise, the price changes for sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks followed the same pattern. After minor fluctuations, the changes in prices for these two food groups went up to 200 and 150 respectively over the 31-year period. However, these figures were consistently lower than the consumer-price index.
By contrast, fresh fruits and vegetable was the only group whose prices rose sharply, particularly after 1985. From the same figure at the start of the period, the prices were always higher than the consumer-price index until 2009, finishing at around 330 in 2009.
- “Individuals should not be allowed to carry guns as it increases the crime and violence in the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?” 56
- Fire plan for the second floor 80
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. 78
- the diagrams below show existing and proposed floor plan for the redevelopment of an art gallery. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13142857143 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75269663703 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548571428571 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2113069871 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.8 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168456561813 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825184190409 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574458409166 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118025219701 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235199187784 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.