The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000
The line graph illustrates changes in the amount of birth rates in two countries are China and the USA over a period of 80 years. Overall, the graph reveals some striking similarities between two countries and it is clear that both nations saw considerable fluctuations in fertility, with the rate reached a peak during the 1950s and gradually decreased during the 2000s.
To begin, in 1920, the number of birth rates of China stood at 10 percent and increased to 15 percent in 1935. 1935 to 1940 saw a sudden drop at 5 percent at the end of this period. This was followed by a period of growth, with fertility in the country reaching a peak of 20 percent in 1950. However, this figure brought a sustained decline from 1950s to 2000s.
Beside the USA birth rates approximately fluctuated at somewhere between 11 and 13 percent of 1920s and 1940s, before plunged to less than 5 percent in 1945. Then over the following five years, there was a significant growth to 15 percent per year, followed by a steady fall during the 2000s.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-11 | thaiha123 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | teulimin.06 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | trucvy112233 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | dhq.testbig | 78 | view |
- The two graphs compare that oil was the major energy source in the USA in both 1980 and 1990 and that the number of coal natural gas and hydroelectric power remained stable in much the same proportions
- Birth rates in China and the USA from 1920 to 2000 73
- significant rise in world trade 22
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 73
- information in the graph 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the 1950s and gradually decreased during the 2000s. To begin, in 1920, the numbe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64480874317 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59829026584 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568306010929 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7228189487 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.25 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20675337652 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918767671641 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107268710881 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143363047966 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749427753678 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.