These days, in many countries, fewer and fewer people want to become teachers, particularly in secondary schools. What are the reasons for this, and how could the problem be solved?
Teaching used to be the most intriguing and rewarding job in the world but now more and more people are reluctant to join this industry, especially in high schools. This is mainly because the teaching industry has become less attractive in terms of working load and treatments. These problems require concerted efforts by the society who should raise the statues of teachers.
Nowadays, schools, particular secondary schools, are more focusing on high academic achievements of their students than the past, posing huge burdens on teachers. It is common that teachers work more than eight hours per day, programming the class curriculum, lecturing several times a day and marking students’ work. However, their contributions are always been undermined if students are failed to performance well in exams as the public used to blame on teachers’ professionalism instead of other facts such as students’ own contributions to study. Furthermore, comparing some other glamorous industries such as banking and IT, teachers are not being treated well, particularly on salary. Teachers earn incredible less than those who work in banks or technology companies, even construction workers. As a result, with high burden but few salary, there is no doubt that fewer people choose to become teachers.
To solve this problem, first, it requires attention on a governmental level. Authorities should reevaluate our educational system by lifting the welfare of teachers. For example, in Singapore, being teachers is always be the one of top options for new graduates although with unimaginable stress as the government has granted a variety of unique welfare for its teachers such as discount for first house. Furthermore, the public need to be fully recognise the importance of teachers, therefore appreciating teachers’ efforts. For instance, in South Korea, high school teachers enjoyed the highest respect as the society acknowledges that those teachers will be the ones who are able to send their students into the best universities in the country.
To sum up, because of the high demand but low pay, teaching are becoming less attractive than the past. However, this issue can be solved if the government can raise teachers’ welfare and the public can acknowledge teachers’ high status in the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-02 | amirah | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | Jermankell | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-23 | codefree | 84 | view |
| 2018-06-01 | namhoangthai | 57 | view |
| 2014-04-22 | uzboy | 90 | view |
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- The charts below show the Medical research funding amount in millions of Dollars in Someland and also shows the death number for this area Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graphs below Write at least 150 words 79
- People’s lives are now surrounded by advertisement. This affects what people consider important and has a negative impact on people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- These days, in many countries, fewer and fewer people want to become teachers, particularly in secondary schools. What are the reasons for this, and how could the problem be solved? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 853, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun salary seems to be countable; consider using: 'few salaries'.
Suggestion: few salaries
...kers. As a result, with high burden but few salary, there is no doubt that fewer people ch...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 219, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... in Singapore, being teachers is always be the one of top options for new graduate...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, no doubt, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45303867403 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06445118819 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574585635359 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8539575648 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.375 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195736486966 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675561254264 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490757937772 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117589370945 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343572921344 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.