As countries develop, their populations tend to live individually or in small
family units. In your opinion, what is this cause and what are the effects on
society?
Over the past few decades, the size of families has decreased in most countries, with an increasing number of people choosing to remain single or to live away from their parents. The main reasons for this trend lie in social development as well as the change of conception, and the effects on society are commonly negative.
The typical reason related to the high mobility of the population is the
convenience of transport and telecommunication which allow people to move
more frequently. For example, a huge number of young people migrate from the countryside to the city to earn a living. Many of them end up settling down in the city where they work, while their parents are reluctant to leave the hometown. This results in the separation of children, adults and elderly. Another essential factor is the change of conception. As people’s living standard is raised, they become eager for more independence and privacy. Accordingly, if they can afford to buy or rent a house, they prefer to set up small family units and enjoy their
own lifestyles.
As the structure of the family changes, the bond of family members seems to become weaker and there have arisen a series of social problems. For one thing, the government has to pay for potentially huge medical care expenditure from its fiscal budget. This is because old people are in need of care and attention but it is hard to acquire from their children since those children are occupied with their own business and the two generations are separated by long distance. For another, the progress of the society will be hindered in the long term. Young couples in small families have to cope with all problems without any help from their parents, particularly taking care of their babies, and this is usually the source of high stress, which will undoubtedly reduce their working efficiency and will stunt the development of related companies and industries.
In conclusion, the mode of nuclear family is expected to become the mainstream of our society as a result of urbanization, and its destructive effects on our society ought to be taken into consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-30 | vyhanh | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | Diem Hang 1612 | 69 | view |
- With the increased demand for energy sources of oil and gas, people should lookfor sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places. Do theadvantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas? 89
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opini 84
- In the modern world, mobile and smartphone use has become universal in most parts of the world. Although there are clearly many advantages of this technology, there are many who believe it also brings many disadvantages. Discuss both points of view and gi 89
- Some people hold that we should spend amount of time and money on the protection of wild animals Some people argue that they should be spent on human populations To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In modern societies, it is possible for people to go shopping, work andcommunicate via the internet without face-to-face communication. Is it a positive or negative development? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e high mobility of the population is the convenience of transport and telecommuni...
^^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...communication which allow people to move more frequently. For example, a huge num...
^^^
Line 4, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...et up small family units and enjoy their own lifestyles. As the structure of the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94677871148 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7993187483 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554621848739 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5303152916 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.533333333 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.46666666667 7.06120827912 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110427695499 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340794926869 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323619385428 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0518133113324 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034642175643 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.