Given high unemployment rate, it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education. What do you think?
it is a well-established fact that the number of people who are out of jobs is on the rise, and one of solutions suggested is giving up secondary education. I am of the opinion that, however, knowledge in this level plays an important part and it does help ease the unemployment problem for the following reasons.
To begin with, basic knowledge gained from primary school including numeracy and literacy is not enough for students to conceive academic information in higher education. secondary education, therefore, gives students a holistic background about all subjects, thus understanding better about what areas they would truly like later on. As a result, this reduce unemployment rate when students safe in knowledge about the career of their choice.
Secondly, now that the proliferation of robots is taking over manual jobs such as salesman, waters, and to compete with such advances of artificial intelligence, students should have concrete foundation of knowledge and skills. taking Japan as an example, students there study different stages adequately, since only doing so could they have enough knowledge and control the wheel, not be stolen jobs by robots.
Last but not least, I do understand that perhaps many say that investing in secondary education may add burden to state budget, and officials need to provide opportunities for students to work and learn first-hand skills like problem-solving, teamwork earlier. students who finish grade schools, however, are usually around eleven, a stage in which they do not develop enough in both physical and cognitive development, so they could not work or learn hard and endure hardship of working environment.
All things considered, it seems to me that in order to solve joblessness, government should place emphasis on education, and encourage students to go through enough stages of education including secondary one, provided that they justify the learning programs so that it does not cover too much theory and provide more skills-related subjects as well.
- table 11
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have educational value. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 89
- a table shows monthly expenditure of an Australian family in 1991 and in 2001 84
- table 84
- Given high unemployment rate, it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education. What do you think? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is a well-established fact that the num...
^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondary
...ademic information in higher education. secondary education, therefore, gives students a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Taking
...ete foundation of knowledge and skills. taking Japan as an example, students there stu...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 263, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Students
...like problem-solving, teamwork earlier. students who finish grade schools, however, are ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36875 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93975312526 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.7492205277 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.8 106.682146367 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163966676752 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608875254846 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358657524866 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846539447107 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348290441121 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.0946893788 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.