Tourism is an excellent way to develop a country, but it can also cause harm. How can countries ensure that tourism benefits the development?
Tourism is one of the key aspects that bring an intense progression to a particular country. However, there has been a thought-arising debate whether this industry poses somewhat hazards. In this essay I would cite my position on this whilst indicate some feasible actions could be taken by governments to provide that tourism reinforces the development.
First and foremost, it is irrefutable to note that profits which tourism is presenting to economies are immeasurable. Prevailingly, globetrotting, apart from serving as an exhilarating activity for tourists, is becoming a profound source of income for many host countries. Not surprisingly, the industry is creating new workplaces whilst opportunities for unemployed citizens. Obviously, this tendency is contributing to a drastic decline in rates of unemployment. For instance, tourism is feeding majority of poor families dwelling in African and mid-Asian developing countries.
Admittedly, tourism brings some considerable damages for visited areas. Today, it is an acknowledgeable truth that not all visitors' attitude is positive towards the hosts. Plainly, countries endeavor to create the most luxurious conveniences for the trotters and this is actually a labor-intensive deed. Eventually, locals are commencing to "sacrifice" themselves and ensure tourists with hot showers and accommodations.
Nonetheless, there are several number of viable remedies to eliminate the harm. Governments may impose constraints on having an access to fragile places and construct special hotels for tourist to live in. This would function somehow against the financial aspect, but provide protection for the vulnerability.
To recapitulate, although tourism is one of the chief sources of profit, it is mentionable to advocate the impinge on host country in some ways. But, governments are capable to alleviate the downside and tourism remains beneficial for the development.
- Whether or not someone achievestheir aimsis mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- People should look after their health as a duty to the society where they live, rather than their own benefits. What extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems.To what extend do you agree? 61
- People should look after their health for personal benefits, rather than a duty for a society. What extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems.To what extend do you agree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'visitors'' or 'visitor's'?
Suggestion: visitors'; visitor's
...s an acknowledgeable truth that not all visitors attitude is positive towards the hosts....
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'several numbers'.
Suggestion: several numbers
...commodations. Nonetheless, there are several number of viable remedies to eliminate the har...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...nments may impose constraints on having an access to fragile places and construct special...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 104, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...f profit, it is mentionable to advocate the impinge on host country in some ways. But, gove...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, well, apart from, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87632508834 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.457502829 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646643109541 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3703366008 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.8235294118 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6470588235 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161156041647 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04900528945 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446561105596 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862368484864 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269449056867 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.