Advertisements of toys and fast foods are obstacles to children’s physical and mental development, and, at the same time, cause loss of time and money of parents.
Commercials on the television and newspapers are the prime source to know about different products available in the market. In this modern world, individuals are highly influenced by the way advertisements are presented in public. Especially in the case of children, the advertising agency makes them tempted to buy their products irrespective of the quality of the product. Therefore impacting children and their parents in many ways.
Fast food consumption is quite popular among younger generations which have proven adverse effects on health such as illness and obesity. Packaging design and representation of these food items persuade pupils to buy such products without making them aware of side effects. Moreover, kids are not mature enough to decide which product they should purchase and which they should not. Thus taking advantage of companies to make advertisements of products with celebrity to gain the attention of a maximum number of people.
Toys advertisement is another drawback in society these days, toys are meant to playing games, improving the skills and creativity of a child. However, most of the toy companies advertise their products without taking precautionary steps. For instance, a majority of these items are similar to each other such as guns. Carrying different variant of guns will no way help the kid to develop his rational thinking. Such kids while dealing things in the reality will not prove good enough to tackle issues themselves.
In summary, it is irrefutable that advertisement of products plays a vital role in our society, albeit companies take advantage of this nature by presenting the products of the second class to the society without making caution signs, thus in which kids are the most vulnerable and impacts badly on their mental and physical development. Hence resulting waste of money of parents in buying such products.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-31 | bhatvishal@ | 82 | view |
- Some people think it is better for people to change their career at least once in their life and do a different kind of jobs. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people prefer to shop for food in supermarkets. Other people prefer to do their food shopping online. Discuss both views and giver your opinion. 61
- An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers, are leaving their own poorer countries to work in a developed countries. What problems does this cause? What can be done to deal with this situation? 61
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
- While recruiting a new employee the employer should pay more attention to personal qualities rather than qualification and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 376, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...spective of the quality of the product. Therefore impacting children and their parents in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 339, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... their mental and physical development. Hence resulting waste of money of parents in ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in summary, such as, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32441471572 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81417807091 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595317725753 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6682978511 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108713573536 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035522133913 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299647241466 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0679846561158 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141458970683 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.