The percentage of inhabitants who had access to many communication services around the world.
The chart gives information about the percentage of inhabitants who had access to many communication services around the world.
Initially, the number of landline users stood at about 14%, which was the highest number of the five communication services. The 2000 to 2006 period saw an upward trend in the figure from 18% to 20%. After that, the number of landline users decreased slightly. At the end of the survey, the figure ranked third.
In 1998, the numbers of Internet and cellular phone users were as the same level. On the one hand, the former rocketed from 1008 to 20004. In 2014, more people used the Internet with about 30% of the world population using it. This figure continued going up and peaked at more than 60% of the world inhabitants. On the other hand, the figure of cellular phone users increased slightly until 2004. After that, there was a slight rise in the figure from 10% to over 20%.
However, mobile and fixed broadband were not introduced until 2002 and 2004. There was an upward trend in the number of users of both services. At the end of the survey, the former was minimally higher than the latter (5% and 4% respectively)
Overall, people used Internet and cellular phone more than other services.
- The percentage of inhabitants who had access to many communication services around the world. 56
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 67
- The bar chart illustrates how often Americans came to fast food eateries from 2003 to 2013
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in own and rented accommodation in Wales and England between 1918 and 2011
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80841121495 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40009116344 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514018691589 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3340346372 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.5 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2857142857 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35714285714 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16360582169 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629216813461 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190705870467 0.0843802449381 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16117828373 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.293435652241 0.0819641961636 358% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.