Every year several languages die out. Some people think that it is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
Well, language is extremely crucial for their nation. A recent decade are witness of development in social sector. Amid this development, there is one phenomenon that has associated with it. According to this phenomenon, languages are vanished due to increase in number of speaker of common language like English ad china. Since, faction of people belief that it is more beneficial for global, people find it easy to communicate with other nation's people. I will try to throw light upon the issue are created through languages. Also, I will try to posit my perspective about it.
To embark on, there are multifarious reasons to shore those people who are in favor of fewer language has more merits. To justify, few numbers of languages are available in community bring more advantages like people may find it more convenient and pleasant experience to communicate with all people who are not belong to native place. Nevertheless, if people get education with common language would acquire profound knowledge of any field at global level whether it may led to develop nation with education which explicitly affect to nation economy. In addition, people migrate to another countries for gain the working skill and education. Thereby, they are less likely to find difficulties to interact with dwellers and have more chance to obtain high position at their work station.
On the other side of spectrum, there are several reasons for explaining the problems that are produced from vanished languages. Firstly, languages are direct associate with culture. Either it may futile among the people or vanished then culture and tradition would become disappear. Furthermore, all languages have its own moral value that can not be deniable because people are addicted to western culture and follow its standardization. This may led to citizens feel isolated and they are feasible to live sedentary life.
Aggelomerating, all the points I elaborated an above that can be concluded that languages are more vital than any other sector. Hence, all people have to save their native languages which may have traditional value and history which cause people have demotivated from past history of any nation. That is why, I support that declaration that languages have been preserved for betterment of nation's reputation. It is more fruitful in my opinion.
- If a product is sold and people buy it, then advertising is not necessary and can be considered a kind of entertainment. Do you agree or disagree with this? 73
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980 and the 1990s. 78
- The table chart and pie chart give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to us between 1988 and 2000. 67
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most Large companies However some people think that an interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...communicate with all people who are not belong to native place. Nevertheless, if peopl...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, well, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22546419098 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74507744693 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0272488109 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8095238095 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9523809524 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09523809524 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207381523448 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615076185071 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444328038429 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134338163035 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014239486117 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.