Advertising encourages consumers to buy in quantity rather than promoting quality.
To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
Product marketing has become popular among manufacturers over the period of time and affecting consumer’s mindset. Most of the advertisements influence customers to buy more number of products rather than focusing on quality. Gone are the days when makers used to focus on quality of the product. This essay will argue that why focus on quantity by maker is completely dishonest rather working on grade of the product.
Some companies publicize their products with high discounts and target to sell more number of items, ignoring to promote quality of the item. Subsequently, manufacturer increase their productivity and this leads to more profit for them. Indeed, there have been some recorded instances when companies offered deals and heavy discounts on many items, for example, buy one get three, buy 2 get seven free, and more than fifty percent discounts. To sum up, many makers target selling quantity of items, despite of poor quality items.
On the other hand, some manufacturers publicize features and promote quality of the product rather focusing on quantity of the product. Initially, when they introduce a new product in the market, they make campaigns for marketing of newly launched product to promote quality. Once their product becomes popular in the market, then they too focus on selling quantity of the product. Overall, most of the sellers' targets huge numbers of buyers rather than some customers who loves quality and grade of the product.
This essay argued that companies target selling large number of products to make profit and ignoring the quality standards of the product. In my opinion, it is completely ridiculous that advertisements are made to focus on quantity rather than quality which is more important to customers.
- People nowadays prefer to interact online e g do shopping chat with friends rather than talking to other people face to face What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exa 81
- Your local newspaper is offering an award for people who have helped the community Write a letter to the newspaper editor In your letter suggest someone you think should receive the award describe what the person does to help the community suggest an awar 64
- Creative artists should always have the freedom to express their ideas (in paintings, books, films and songs) in anyway they wish. The government should not restrict what they doTo what extent do you agree with this opinion? 73
- You have recently moved to a different location Write a letter to an english speaking friend In your letter explain why you have moved describe the new house invite your friend to come and visit 87
- Your local council is considering closing a sports and leisure centre that it runs, on order to save money.Write a letter to the local council. In your letter-give details of how you and your friends or family use the centre-explain why the sports and lei 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...me popular among manufacturers over the period of time and affecting consumer's mindset. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...s rather than focusing on quality. Gone are the days when makers used to focus on q...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, for example, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27304964539 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69752824244 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485815602837 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2998174344 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.214285714 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139909281877 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631691650411 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601365453817 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10122720516 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276853740011 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.