Nuclear
Practical dependencies in utilization of non-renewable energy resources, such as oil and coal, are becoming more complex. Gradual cost increment, depleting supplies, and worsen by its impact of global warming are challenging us to seek for options. Therefore, I support the idea to find alternative solutions for energy, aside from nuclear.
Nuclear energy may provide long-lasting source of energy so this powerful resource can potentially supply all our energy needs for many countries. However, nuclear emits high-intensity radioactive wave which may harms living creature. The kind of radiation could cause cancer when exposed to organism during certain period of time. At the end of harvesting cycle, wastes left by nuclear compounds will still emit the radiation and difficult to decompose. More importantly, nuclear power plants could become the target of terrorist attack. Technology could do very little to prevent such an attack, and the consequences are unthinkable.
On the other hand, renewable energy resources, such as wind and sea wave energy, could become an alternative energy because they are eco-friendly, low risk, and very efficient. Wind energy could be easily harvested on high-elevated ground whilst sea wave energy along coastal shore line with minimum man-made infrastructure and preserving as it is. Wind turbine, which is a common tool used to harvest wind energy, generates electricity from rotating dynamo. In contrast, sea wave energy produces electricity by creating a pressure that transform into kinetic energy.
To sum up, the realistic alternative energy is not only nuclear but also wind and sea wave energy. With enhanced technological development, harvesting these resources is becoming more practical along the time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-05 | Molla Md Rezaul Karim | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | ÁNH HANDSOME | view | |
| 2023-03-20 | Mollymaul | 81 | view |
| 2023-01-18 | Fila | 73 | view |
- The different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city from 1960 to 2000 67
- schools have several problems with students’ behaviour 78
- The diagram provides information about the production of chocolate while a breakdown of the chocolate pricing proportion is presented in the bar graph. 73
- the quantity of Japanese who travel out of Japan from 1985 to 1990 and the market proportion of Japanese tourist traveling to Australia 67
- The number of wheat exports in Canada, EU, and Australia 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...when exposed to organism during certain period of time. At the end of harvesting cycle, wastes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, in contrast, kind of, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65037593985 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97227707361 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65037593985 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7055951028 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.2 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191449747822 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799371210845 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998236135992 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133388899528 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980988327212 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.