One way to solve the problem of congestion in cities is to build sky trains which run overhead rather than on or under the ground.What are the advantages and disadvantages of using this solution to solve congestion?

Essay topics:

One way to solve the problem of congestion in cities is to build sky trains which run overhead rather than on or under the ground.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of using this solution to solve congestion?

it is often argued that whether the public transport building by government should be undergound rather than on above. there are both advantages and disadvantages to the topic. In this essay I will discuss why underground public transport will solve the traffic congestion compared to sky trains.
To begin with, there are many points are in favor of my stance.First and foremost, by building underground train network, there will lot space and city or town look adorable.Secondly, it will take less congestion during construction because it has less impact on current roads. For example, during construction of metro network of Dubai took less congestion compared to other countries. Hence, public transport must be constructed below the ground.
Moreover, constructing sky rails is more costlier than underground transport. it require more resources and time and blackout time of current road will be higher. Construction time for sky-rails are much higher, and it requires a heavy machinery compared to other. For instance, underground metro constructed in Dubai has less budget than the other. So, governments should plan underground system because it is economically viable.
In conclusion, there are both advantages and disadvantages but advantages outweigh more than disadvantages by constructing underground ways, and they are economically viable and city also looks beautiful.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-11 thammineni 77 view
2019-01-05 lalacamargo1 77 view
2018-06-19 hoandang 86 view
2018-03-13 imala1 80 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is often argued that whether the public...
^^
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...uld be undergound rather than on above. there are both advantages and disadvantages t...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: First
...e many points are in favor of my stance.First and foremost, by building underground t...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Secondly
...ot space and city or town look adorable.Secondly, it will take less congestion during co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'costlier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: costlier
...d. Moreover, constructing sky rails is more costlier than underground transport. it require ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...re costlier than underground transport. it require more resources and time and bla...
^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'requires'?
Suggestion: requires
...costlier than underground transport. it require more resources and time and blackout ti...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 210.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61428571429 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1735192594 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561904761905 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.3937089611 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.25 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.25397266985 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179782002941 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674946620957 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502698029668 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123648160544 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614326597239 0.0609392437508 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.