Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that most countries believe that the key to tackle the problems of starve and poverty is having a prosperous economy, whereas some other people argue that it must be stopped due to its detrimental impacts on the environment. I this essay, I will discuss both views before giving my own opinion.
On the one hand, starve and poverty are two of the extreme crucial problems that people are facing today. This is no doubt that the fundamental way to solve these two problems is developing economy. Because not only the country but also impoverished people can benefit from economy growth. Country’s agricultural and industrial productivity will be greatly boosted during the development of economy. It means that the country can produce more food to cater its starving population or have sufficient money to import food from other countries. Additionally, economic development also brings more job opportunities for people which will increase people’s income, enabling them to purchase adequate necessities for their daily lives.
On the other hand, some people opine that the environmental deterioration stems from economic growth. They argue that the economic prosperity comes from the depletion of natural resources such as water, forest and land. The depletion then causes several environmental problems such as climate change, forest degradation and water pollution. Therefore, they believe that economic growth must be stopped for conserving our environment. However, I think the argument is too naive. It is inevitable to alter the environment as nations have duty to supply enough food and create wealth living conditions for its citizens. Furthermore, countries will have an increasing number of funds to preserve our environment because of the economic growth.
In conclusion, I contend that economic growth is the key to solve hunger and poverty and the argument of stopping developing the economy because of the environmental problems is too unthoughtful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | kieuoanh.dau | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Mai Thu Minh | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | codefree | 67 | view |
- These days, in many countries, fewer and fewer people want to become teachers, particularly in secondary schools. What are the reasons for this, and how could the problem be solved? 84
- The charts below show the Medical research funding amount in millions of Dollars in Someland and also shows the death number for this area Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graphs below Write at least 150 words 79
- People’s lives are now surrounded by advertisement. This affects what people consider important and has a negative impact on people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, so, then, therefore, whereas, i think, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45631067961 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97407657805 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546925566343 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6556249959 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.375 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240190596992 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803469723158 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681614836371 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148603018604 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373430886137 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.