Many people are busy with work and do not have enough time to spend with family and friends. Why does this happen? What are the effects of this on family life and society as a whole?
Nowadays, in a fiercely competitive world, people tend to work harder and have longer working hours, resulting in less time spent for their family and friends. There are a number of reasons behind this tendency and I would argue that it has deleterious consequences of family and social life.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why people spend more time in their workplace. Firstly, in the globalised world, most of the companies have to face with keen international competitions, which require hard-working and diligent employees in order to earn profit and achieve sustainable developments. The more business sectors become intensely competitive, the more work volume is required, resulting in people need to work extra hours to accomplish their tasks. Secondly, as daily expenses of a family have been rising day-by-day, working harder can allow people to meet their basic needs. This could help people to buy a comfortable house or go on luxury holidays due to a greater amount of money from working overtime.
On the other hand, this phenomenon of longer working hours could bring about several negative impacts on both family and society. From family prospective, many parents abandon their children because of hectic working. This may lead to some youngsters feel the lack of parental care, and they might be more vulnerable to psychological and social risks. Children can easily get addicted to video games or become highly susceptible to inappropriate content on the Internet. Some even are involved in violence and drug use, which are harmful to their development later in life. In terms of society, many people spending too much time on working would have serious impacts on community health. Owing to busy corporate life, people have little time for engaging outdoor activities or take regular exercise, giving rise to a sedentary lifestyle that is highly detrimental to their physical health.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are various reasons for spending excessive time in workplaces and it has negative influences on both family life and society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-04 | MinyiChu | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-03 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | sharanbhullar | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | idid382002 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people Others think that it is causing the opposite effect Discuss both the views and give your opinion 74
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as auseful educational tool. Others, however, believe that videos gamesare having an adverse effect on the people who play them. In youropinion, do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits? 61
- Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people Others think that it is causing the opposite effect Discuss both the views and give your opinion 64
- Many people are busy with work and do not have enough time to spend with family and friends Why does this happen What are the effects of this on family life and society as a whole 77
- Some people think that good health is essential to every person, so medical services should not be run by profit= making companies. Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the advantages ? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21791044776 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72981769645 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570149253731 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3880322206 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.533333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332519904163 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104136364454 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500801462176 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20576056114 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432532753141 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.