Nowadays people always throw old things away, what causes this problem? What effects
does the phenomenon lead to? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant
examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Over the past decades, the buying trends of people has never ceased to draw public attention and provoke debates. although the number of new and modern devices which are replacing traditional ones are dramatically increasing, the issue as to why people tend to throw their old products remain unclear. In the following essay, the reasons behind this phenomenal, along with its consequences will be discussed.
The main trigger is the development of technology that make people’s living standard to be higher. In fact, this is common that there are many products are launched every day. Additional, advertisement industry plays a pivotal role in attracting people’s attention to purchase new goods. So that, audiences could easily find a renew devices with more utilities and applications to replace the old ones. Besides, another reason that added fuel to the fire is the busy life style in modern world. This is due to the fact that citizens have been spending more their time for earning money compared to the past, as a result, they do not have sufficient time to repair objects. Therefore, sometime repairing cost is much higher to the actual value of buying new things.
Besides these benefits, it is undeniable that trend could bring many problems on our environment. Firstly, the production of new products, especially high-tech devices, require the huge number of natural resources. so that, the exhaustion of that resources are ever-increasing. Moreover, in foreseeable future, the amount of garbage will be overload, that could be a potential risk to the air condition. For example, in many countries, residents have to burn the rubbish due to the lack of re-cycling technology, the emission from this activity is the chef culprit of carbon dioxide. This example indicates that the garbage which are throw away by human are destroying our live habitats.
In conclusion, although the increasing of novel technology has been improving our living condition, governments should never underestimate the positive influence of throw things habit on environment as mentioned above.
- Some people say that the most important thing for being rich is people have opportunity for helping other person Do you agree or disag 95
- 28. Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think thatthey are the best people to talk to school students the danger of committing a crime. Towhat extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- 12 Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment Do you agree or disagree 88
- 28. Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities whichare done alone. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- 12. Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own localenvironment. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...w public attention and provoke debates. although the number of new and modern devices wh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s. So that, audiences could easily find a renew devices with more utilities and applica...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...e the huge number of natural resources. so that, the exhaustion of that resources ...
^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...abit on environment as mentioned above.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3343373494 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91003608001 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614457831325 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.431729813 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.176470588 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111997314156 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031062721124 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235018306811 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.064406150601 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159719984913 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.