Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.
To what extent do you agree?
There is an issue about the influence of oil price on the ecology. Some ecologists suggest that boosting the gasoline price is the most effective method to improve the poor condition of the environment. This essay disagrees with their point of view.
Let us start with reasons why some ecologists state that a rise in the fuel price will bring the greatest benefit to the environment. The first reason is that the number of cars running on petrol will decline. The traffic on the roads will gradually diminish, because a growing number of drivers will be unable to purchase prohibitively costly fuel. As a result, the amount of carbon dioxide in the air will decrease significantly. Another reason is that the importance of alternative sources of energy will grow. More companies will begin to research into the environmentally friendly sources of energy, and, subsequently, they will become competitive in the energy market. Furthermore, car manufacturers will devise ways to convert traditional cars into energy-efficient one. They will also transform conventional engines into energy-efficient ones, so that driver will be save on fuel and reduce the concentration of harmful fumes in the atmosphere.
However, some scientists of global warming argue that the high cost of petrol will have insignificant effect on environmental pollution. Firstly, most of the oil companies will supply the energy market with more fuel. The higher the price for oil will become, the more areas of oil these companies will start to develop, so many investors will choose to invest in petroleum market. Petroleum producers will also hamper the development of other sources of fuel. They may create a great deal of obstacles to green-energy companies, since they will be reluctant to lose their share in the fuel industry. Moreover, the complete replacement of traditional cars will linger for long time. The majority car drivers, who are poor people, will not abandon their cars immediately for ecofriendly ones, so the improvement of air quality will stretch for many years.
In conclusion, although some ecologists advocate that expensive petroleum will be the best solution to deal with the polluted ecology, I think that it will only course the minimum positive impact on it for the above mentioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-10 | mani223 | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-28 | mindfulielts | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | annienguyen | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-17 | Tolik | 84 | view |
- You have been invited to attend an interview for a place studying a course in a college. Unfortunately, because of a previous appointment, you cannot come at the time they wish.Write a letter to the admissions tutor:explain your position.apologise and off 78
- many young children have unsupervised access to the internet and using the internet to socialize with others. this can lead to a number of dangerous sitiations which can be threatening for children. what problems do children face when going online withou 84
- Logging of the rain forests is a serious problem and it may lead to the extinction of animal life and human life To what extent to you agree of disagree 11
- In some cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem.What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem? 78
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 7.85571142285 306% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24661246612 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93750937074 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0162935157 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.894736842 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4210526316 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0841052654202 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330590422301 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383476380518 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.06000807522 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0094833984588 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.