Three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular uk school in 1981, 1991 and 2001
The pie chart given below illustrate the turn over in yearly expulsion by specific UK school in 1981, 1992, and 2001. Overall, it can be seen that the most considerable peak for the alteration in yearly expanded by a specific UK school in two decades were teachers salary and the sharpest dipped was other workers salaries. And the most minimal grown annual spending by a particular was insurance, as for furniture and teachers salary were the smallest declined by yearly expulsion. Those were changed a fluctuation. It is measured in percentage.
From 1991, teacher salaries displayed a significant growth from 40 % to 50 % between 1981 to 1991. Followed by resource yearly spending was go up 5 % from 15% win out 20 %. The furniture annual spending failed sharply from 15% to 5% between 1981 to 1991 and other employe salaries gone down arround 6%. About insurance rose gradually from 2% to 1%
In 2001, there was a significant increase of 18% in furniture annual spending from 5% in 1991 to 23%. The second highest yearly expulsion was insurance from 3% in 1991 to 5%. The resources had an enormous decrease of 20% in 1991 to 9%. followed 7% decreased by other employee salaries, that was from 22% to 15%. And the biggest annual spending before which was teacher salaries had an smallest fail of 5% from 50% to 45%
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- Advantages and disadvantages for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school 73
- The GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 78
- What those kids are doing 89
- The percentage of tourists to england who visited four different attractions in Brighton 78
- About internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...ollowed by resource yearly spending was go up 5 % from 15% win out 20 %. The furni...
^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Followed
...enormous decrease of 20% in 1991 to 9%. followed 7% decreased by other employee salaries...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...g before which was teacher salaries had an smallest fail of 5% from 50% to 45%
^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...g before which was teacher salaries had an smallest fail of 5% from 50% to 45%
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78947368421 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64665000379 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0315681429 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5384615385 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.69230769231 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256359246497 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917797592341 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807380289126 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171210414429 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539239704391 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.