The charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006.
Given are two graphs revealing information about how many market share of the film screened in the UK and Australia in 2001, and how many cinema admissions in the UK and Australia between 1976 and 2006. Overall, it can be clearly seen that the share of US films was the highest percentage in the UK and Australian, and cinema admission in the UK was having a higher number than Australia.
Regarding chart A, the films screened in the UK and Australia were dominated by The US film about 65 % and 75% respectively. However, in the UK, its films played accounted for 20%, and its percentage was higher than Australian films for approximately one-tenth. in Australia, the UK' film and Australians' film were less played, counted to around 5%. In addition, other film screen time supported 15% in Australia and well below 10% in the UK.
Moving to chart B, in 1976, the UK cinema admissions were a higher number than Australia's, standing at 100 million and 30 million respectively. Moreover, the UK's cinema admission experienced a hit low of around 60 million in 1985. While Australia's admission fluctuated to 50 million from 1976 to 1990. Finally, both the UK and Australia cinema admission occurred to steadily-increasing trend in 2005, counting to 160 million and 80 million severally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | Shivam7090 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | Jonkun | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | saeed2751366 | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | ryandimaulana41673839 | 73 | view |
- The charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 90
- At present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of young people.do the advantges of this situation outweigh the advantages? 61
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... having a higher number than Australia. Regarding chart A, the films screened in...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...lian films for approximately one-tenth. in Australia, the UK film and Australians ...
^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...a hit low of around 60 million in 1985. While Australias admission fluctuated to 50 m...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, moreover, regarding, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94930875576 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97150000932 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529953917051 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9661768571 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.4 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474208335201 0.215688989381 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202494796109 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945054987782 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327279371043 0.15604864568 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126833036803 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.