The charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006.
The bar graph depicts information on the percentage of films viewed in the United Kingdom and Australia in 2001. Meanwhile, the line graph compares the trend in the number of movie goers in the same countries from 1976 to 2005.
Generally, US films were more preferable in the UK and Australia than the other types of movies by country of origin. It is also clear that there was an increasing trend in the number of admissions in the cinema.
In 2001, US films received the highest market share in the UK at 76 % which was almost four times that for British movies at 20 %. Over 10 % of Australian films were marketable while the other films had 4 %. Similarly, Australians also chose US films at 67 % than all other movies with about 24 % combined.
In terms of viewers, the UK stood with over 100 Million attendees in 1976 but significantly slid to a low of about 60 Million in 1984. From 1985, this figure gradually rose reaching a peak of over 165 Million in 2003 before tailing off at around 155 Million in 2005. Conversely, Australia had a steady increase in its admission rate starting from 30 Million in 1975 reaching to 80 Million by the end of the period. By comparison, both countries have a difference of over 30 Million in 1975 and 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | Shivam7090 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | Jonkun | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | saeed2751366 | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | ryandimaulana41673839 | 73 | view |
- Teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their communities. This is good for the individuals concerned and society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? Discuss, based on your own knowledge and experience. 73
- The first graph gives the number of passengers travelling by train in Sydney The second graph provides information on the percentage of trains running on time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 82
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics. 73
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 73
- The bar charts below provide information about percentages of students who are proficient in a foreign language in different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60714285714 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56586579867 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.3642166265 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.8181818182 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211759660543 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747896806668 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417509082989 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121641723062 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351659060823 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.