The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA
between 1920 and 2000.
The line graphs reveals information about how the birth rates in two different countries, USA and China, have shifted throughout 1920 to 2000.
Overall, the number of birth rates in USA and China decrease over the period given. It can be seen from the graphic that the rate comparison between USA and China is not significantly different on the first period. It then continued until they got their lowest point in 1945 and reached the peak in the next five years, and after that, it decreased dramatically until the end of the period.
USA was leading in the beginning of the stage, but later it turned out that the number had been decreasing significantly since 1950 until the end of the period. It differs from China where China was also dealing with some decrease in the number, but they managed to keep it stable at less than 10%, where USA’s latest level is less than 5%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-07 | kissbiss | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Immosan | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | radikalyuda | 78 | view |
- Debating for Cigarette 56
- Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources.Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 67
- the internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades.Although some of these changes have been negative, the overall effect of thistechnology has been positive. 78
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995 92
- The diagram below shows what happens to pollutants from farming and industry once in a river system 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 728.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38033804416 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4697209762 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178224557412 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104031154598 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104911813029 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151110059442 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106153541705 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.