The map below show the changes to an art gallery floor plan in 2005 and the present day.
The map illustrate how an art gallery floor developed from 2005 to today.
In general, it appears that the art gallery has become a much more modern place with a lift and a ramp for wheel chair. Another interesting point is that the right of the floor has been remained unchanged over the period given.
One interesting change is that a new the café in the left hand of the stair has been replace by a gallery shop. Besides, the disappearance of the gallery office in the plan in 2005 has given birth for a vending machine which stands right front of the gallery shop at present. Another striking change is that the intended exhibition room on the left of the entrance hall is divided into two separate room, including temporary exhibition and children’s areas.
If we look at the central area, from the entrance people can see the receptionist moved to right in the middle of the hall, which has originally located opposite the stairs in the 2005 plan. A final interesting development is the introduction of the lift on the right of the stairs and ramp for wheel chair situated in the left hand of the entrance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-04 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 61
- moving from rural areas to big cities 78
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 73
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 73
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'replaced'.
Suggestion: replaced
... in the left hand of the stair has been replace by a gallery shop. Besides, the disappe...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64824120603 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6021127246 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537688442211 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1375778504 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24569412585 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108011122634 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107649771647 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167458940008 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117509062434 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.