Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People learn things better from those at their own level - such as fellow students or co-workers - than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People have different views about how much distance should be between a learner and his mentor's age in order to optimize the learning process. While some argue that it would be better for learners to be forced to learn from higher level powers-that-be, I believe that students learn better from their own peers because they establish better emotional relationships, they receive more specific information in a more pleasing format.
One of the primary causes is that the more one is interested in a subject, the better he will learn that subject. The reason for that is students will listen precisely what the teacher states, and they spend more time reviewing and studying about the matter, thereby learning it deeper and better. One of the ways of students taking interest in what they are taught is to selecting an appealing person to teach them. Since students make deeper relationships with people of their own circumstances, they will love them more, and thus pay more attention to what he asserts, allocating more time while they are at home for reviewing and studying that subject, thereby ameliorating their academic situation. Therefore, constructing close relationships with a peer tutor, learners can perform better.
Another aspect to consider is that the same level teachers can be more specific in what they learn. For instance, when I was in college in the Buffalo University in New York, I had a lot of professors who were over fifty years olds. Some times what they emphasize the students to learn seemed so irrelevant and boring to me. They had not any applications in the real civil engineering business. But later, a new young faculty member added to our college, and fortunately, I had a course with him in the very first semester. Surprisingly, he was meticulous to address only up-to-date, applied problems, and it was so pleasant to me. Thus, instructors of the same level can be more beneficial because they are able to pinpoint the most interesting applied aspect of the real business.
Additionally, a tutor of the same level is more skilled in using better ways to transmit the gist to the learner. For example, a young professor who uses the new technologies of presentation and showing scientific experiments in classes, undoubtedly would be more successful in transferring the ideas to its students.
In conclusion, although some may posit that people learn better from those who are in higher levels than them, I, personally, believe that learning from same level people is more effective because of the good human relationships between the two, and the ability of such teachers to focus on the most beneficial subjects in a more appealing appearance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | thonsapon83 | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | alinypv | 70 | view |
| 2019-07-19 | parker35494 | 70 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | Hardy1991 | 76 | view |
| 2019-03-04 | mehrnazsadr | 73 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. 56
- Bayside schools are doing a poor job because the test scores, graduation and college admission rates are low. 59
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 89
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 73
- Giving expert commentary by professors is of great benefit to the professors themselves as well as to their universities and the general public. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...-that-be, I believe that students learn better from their own peers because they estab...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...information in a more pleasing format. One of the primary causes is that the mo...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er tutor, learners can perform better. Another aspect to consider is that the s...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g applied aspect of the real business. Additionally, a tutor of the same level ...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ransferring the ideas to its students. In conclusion, although some may posit t...
^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...though some may posit that people learn better from those who are in higher levels tha...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2244.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04269662921 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84692938858 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503370786517 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.0955408126 48.9658058833 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1764705882 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222536229575 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667216956282 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722955307605 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138739746898 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795255306224 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.