The graph shows average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010.
The bar chart illustrates the yearly average costs on cell phone and residential phone services among the United States customers from 2001 to 2010, in a duration of 10 years. Overall, as it can be seen the residential phone service increased during the time span.
As is given in the graph, average annual expenditures on mobile and residential phone services instances by about 200 dollars and a little more than 700 dollars, respectively. In the first six years, cell phone service costs dramatically rose, although the other service expenditures for American customers gradually reduced in the same years. In the year 2006, both services cost became equal on almost $500. After that, the upward trend for mobile service costs and downward trend for residential phone service expenditures continued. In the last year of 10 decade, cell phone costs stood on approximately $750, whereas the costs for the residential phone service plunged to around 400 dollars.
- The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries, and the pie chart shows the percentages of books, by type, that were borrowed over this time. 78
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 39
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 73
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons. 61
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1935483871 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73913329297 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587096774194 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7079251511 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463505119112 0.215688989381 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224150456441 0.103423049105 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978280334445 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.383792427308 0.15604864568 246% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134713297375 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.