Many university students live with their families, while others live away
from home because their universities are in different places. What are the
advantages and disadvantages of both situations?
Lots of students, today, have to live in dorms because their home is far away from universities, while others can stay with their families. Both situations have their beneficial and detrimental.
On the one hand, living with families have several advantages and disadvantages. Firstly, the economical accommodation, these students do not have to pay for their living fee, so they will save some money for entertainment. Secondly, if they live in wealthy families, their parents will support them such as meals and space for learning. Therefore, they do not have to divide their finances for these things. However, although these students do not worry about basic facilities, their coöperation abilities and self-care skills will limit in some ways. As a result, if they work in companies, they can struggle with many hard situations because of lacking these skills.
On the other hand, students stay away from home also have some benefits and drawbacks. In the negative term, they have to share the living spaces with other classmates to afford the cost of accommodation, and all of them always divide their budgets economically to have enough money for studying. Besides that, staying together will have an amount of distraction such as noises which can affect the routine life of students. However, on the positive side, they can support each other in studying, caring or sharing the joys and sorrows. Moreover, these students are trained in crucial skills which will help them when they go to work later.
In conclusion, students may stay with their parents or live far away from home because their universities are in different places. However, these two options have their advantages and disadvantages.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because oftechnology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that peoplemake? Has this been a positive or negative development? 78
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011. 78
- The table illustrates how much money donated to support technology, by the US, EU, and other countries charities, in billions of US dollars between 2006 and 2010. 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because oftechnology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that peoplemake? Has this been a positive or negative development? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some money for entertainment. Secondly, if they live in wealthy families, their ...
^^
Line 5, column 642, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l help them when they go to work later. In conclusion, students may stay with th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22463768116 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73128813706 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525362318841 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9090138797 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329353487563 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127002744552 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114268241772 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2637841034 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115541404818 0.056905535591 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.