The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011
The line graph compares the average price of a barrel of oil with the food price index over a period of 11 years.
It is clear that average global prices of both oil and food rose considerably between 2000 and 2011. Furthermore, the trends for both commodities were very similar, and so a strong correlation (93.6%) is suggested.
In the year 2000, the average global oil price was close to $25 per barrel, and the food price index stood at just under 90 points. Over the following four years both prices remained relative stable, before rising steadily between 2004 and 2007. By 2007, the average oil price had more than doubled, to nearly $60 per barrel, and food prices had risen by around 50 points.
A dramatic increase in both commodity prices was seen from 2007 to 2008, with the oil prices reaching a peak of approximately $130 per barrel and the food prices index rising to 220 points. However, by the beginning of 2009 the price of oil had dropped by roughly $90, and the food price index was down by about 80 points. Finally, in 2011, the average oil price rose once again, to nearly $100 per barrel, while the food price index reached its peak, at almost 240 points.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-24 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
- The line chart above compares the amount of beef, pork, broilers and turkey, which the Americans consumed each year between 1995 and 2012.It is clear from the chart that both broilers and turkey flesh eating, increased significantly from 1960 to 2012 whil 78
- The table above compares the differences in the sales of coffee and banana whose Fairtrade labels had been attached in five countries in Europe in the two years of 1999 and 2004.It is clear that over the five-year period, the UK is still ranked the highes 73
- The first line graph shows the average monthly spending on children’s sports by their parents from 2008 to 2014 while the second one presents the amount of children participating in football, athletics and swimming in the UK at the same time.It is clear 73
- The line chart above compares waste output in tonnes among 3 companies A, B and C from 2000 to 2005.It can be seen from the graph that both companies A and B witnessed the downward trend of waste output over 15-year period). In contrast, the amount of was 73
- This table gives information about the forest area in some parts of the world for 15 years from 1995 to 2005.It is clear from the table that millions of hectares of land to be used to plant forest all over the regions, but it is tending to decline.In 1990 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52830188679 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24971815014 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52358490566 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.549270186 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348535260513 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185683514499 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114622388114 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243920235026 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158671547211 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.