Downtown Zurzi is becoming increasingly congested with traffic, increasing the commuting
time for those who work downtown or near downtown. The nearby city of Loft was faced with
the same problem several years ago and implemented a small weekly tax for driving one's car
downtown, Downtown traffic almost immediately subsided in Loft and the local government also
raised much-needed money for fixing the roads elsewhere. obviously, this plan should be implemented
in Zurzi in order to solve the brewing traffic congestion problem.
The author claims that downtown ZURZI is becoming increasingly congested with traffic and proposed a solution to the problem. The provided solution for a nearby city Loft was faced with the same problem and the local government implemented a small weekly tax for driving one's car downtown. Morover, the local government raised money from the road taxing. However, the overall proposal contains some flaws and will not accept if it fails to answer some critical question. Moreover, the conclusion cancels some assumption and draws an accurate conclusion.
Firstly, the author states that the nearby city implemented a taxing for one's car downtown and traffic almost decline in Loft city. But, this statement is quite vague and ambiguous because the author did not state the size of the two cities and resident of these cities. It is possible that the resident of the Loft city is less and that's why the law is easily implemented. Moreover, people of Loft city may come less in downtown. The downtown traffic is congested means the law of driving is quite discoherent and maybe the size of the downtown small than the Loft city.
Secondly, if the city government increase tax without proper investigation then it is not acceptable. It may be putting a financial strain on the citizen. Taxing may be negatively affected by the citizen and may impact on the local business owner. Thus, the local government should make a pragmatic decision on this problem. Moreover, The government raised money for taxing the road then why the government do not repair the road and may be increased the lane and add some foot over bridge or underpass for the pedestrian which can reduce traffic in downtown.
On the other hands, Zurzi town can divide the time slot for the vehicles. Such as, the heavy vehicle cannot pass on the road in peak hours and also can promote some awareness that share the car with other so that reduce fuel and energy. Moreover, the local government can increase public transport for office going people. As a result, time will be consumed and the traffic will reduce.
To conclude, the overall hypothesis is quite interesting but need more information to validate the statement. The result of the statement only accepted if it ables to answer the previous assumption.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-01 | Seema Modak | 30 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
- Five years ago, the local university built two new dormitories through different contractors:Aleph Construction and Gimmel Builders. The buildings were nearly identical, though it cost Gimmel Builders approximately 20 percent more to construct their dormi 50
- tpo 14Every year, forest fires and severe storms cause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice of removing dead trees fr 78
- The city council of Town X has proposed reducing the city’s electric expenses by switching all the lights in public buildings from incandescent bulbs to light-emitting diodes (LEDs). The switch would be made gradually as the old incandescent bulbs burn 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 383 350
No. of Characters: 1857 1500
No. of Different Words: 181 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.424 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.849 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.475 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 135 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 71 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.238 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.892 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.762 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.297 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.532 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.089 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...he nearby city implemented a taxing for ones car downtown and traffic almost decline...
^^^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...e resident of the Loft city is less and thats why the law is easily implemented. More...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 55.5748502994 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 2260.96107784 84% => OK
No of words: 383.0 441.139720559 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97389033943 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56723428458 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 204.123752495 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490861618799 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 705.55239521 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.76447105788 148% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8681467355 57.8364921388 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7142857143 119.503703932 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2380952381 23.324526521 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09523809524 5.70786347227 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350099168666 0.218282227539 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986574469557 0.0743258471296 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123975991864 0.0701772020484 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172605390459 0.128457276422 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124305503626 0.0628817314937 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.3799401198 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 98.500998004 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.