1. The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999.
The line graph presents how the proportion of people out of work changed in the US and Japan from March 1993 to March 1999.
The percentage of the US tended to decrease over the years. However, at the same time, unfortunately, Japan witnessed the rapid growth in the rates. Nevertheless, in 1999, both nations almost had the same percentage, which means the lowest figures of the US were equal to the highest ones of Japan.
In year 1993, the percentage of unemployed people in the Us was over 7 % , which was the highest in the survey, followed by a fast decrease to about 5.5% in March 1995. From 1995 to 1996, the ratio of people lost their job sightly increased again to over 5.5% before the figure kept the downward trend again to reach the lowest point again with 4.5% of people in the Us became jobless.
The proportion of unemployment in Japan was only 2.3% in the first year of the survey, which followed the upward trend to increase fastly. The figure of this country reached the highest point in 1999 with about 4.7%.
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done 87
- 1. The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999. 73
- Some argue younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government while others think this is a good idea 56
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What are the solution 78
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and it is positive or negative development 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...unemployed people in the Us was over 7 % , which was the highest in the survey, fo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, nevertheless
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61081081081 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37265682615 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524324324324 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5637467665 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265376669942 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117674650826 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116516586839 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18301315104 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12593975386 0.0819641961636 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.