Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view
It is believed by a section of people that the critical thinking ability is enhanced in collective activity. In my opinion, I partially agree with the statement. I think we tend to unravel the deepest mysteries of mind when we are in solitude. This essay will discuss that group work may boosts one’s intellect, however, it is the individual effort that really matters.
Firstly, when we are part of a group, we receive assistance from our peers. This might look great at the first instance, but when we look closely it is in fact acting as a hindrance to our thinking. Secondly, more often than not there is disagreement among the people. In other words, it might lead to chaos. To illustrate, several people participating in a media debate end up throwing rants at each other rather than having a productive discussion. While I have pointed out the negative aspects, it is still a matter of choice and comfort.
On the other hand, working individually allows us to be more focused in our work, as a result we turn out to be more innovative. Furthermore, there is no external disturbance that causes deviation. This helps us to come up with new thoughts and ideas. For instance, if we have a glance at the life of one of the greatest physicist, Einstein. He worked alone for most of his life, and was awarded nobel prize for his work on photoelectric effect.
In conclusion, when we work alone on something, we can definitely better use our thoughts. This essay has discussed that working individually is the best way to improve our intelligence. Hence, if you want to unleash the unlimited power of brain, start pondering alone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | kongkona | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | Navkiran kaur | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | CANADA | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | Sonali Guha | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | mehnaaz | 61 | view |
- Some people think that there are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change. Others believe that action by individuals is useless and irrelevant and that it is only governments and large businesses which can make a difference. 56
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view 61
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view 11
- school 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...designed to lure our minds. As a result, we order things that are not of any use....
^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ked. Videos that we watch on YouTube and items we search for in Amazon is activel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 57.0 24.0651302605 237% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74038461538 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.969310412 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535256410256 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6908776842 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1666666667 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.