The pie charts below sahow the comparison of differnet kinds of energy production of france in two years
The pie charts given below ilustrate the two pie charts below show the comparision of different kinds energy production of France in two years. The deta presents in percentage. Overall it can be seen that the bigest percentage was coal while thhe most negative trend was other.
In the one hand in 1995 coal got 29.80% which the bigest catagory, followed by gas which was 29.65% was the second bigher by petro 29.27% and followed by nuclear 6.40% and the small which was other 4.90%.
On the other hand in 2005 coal got in crease 1.3% folowed by gas wich was 0.68%, but petro experince descrease 9.27% and which experience incrase drastic was other 4.2% and followed by nuclear 3.7%.
Notes :
From the two pie charts can be accepted conclusion, from 1995 to 2005 there are experience incrase and as well as experince decrease.
And for experince incrase are cial 1.3%, gas 0.68%, other 4.2%, nuclear 3.7% and which experience decrease is petro 9.27%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | CHÚC | view | |
| 2023-07-02 | Risti | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 56
- The proportion of carbohydrates, protein, and fat in three different diets 67
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 61
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 56
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kinds'' or 'kind's'?
Suggestion: kinds'; kind's
...below show the comparision of different kinds energy production of France in two year...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87804878049 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29332884874 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5680627234 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159458167829 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092155193537 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184150187576 0.0843802449381 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942908765965 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138366820612 0.0819641961636 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.