As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Just by taking the quick reflection of past we can ascertain that how technology has revolutionized the whole world, whether it is workplace or home everything is changed. Technology bring the tremendous breakthrough in the field of industry, transportation, energy, living standard of human beings etc. Its technology that helps us to find the answer of unsolved quandaries of past those were daunting us for centuries. It just because of science and technology we are able to communicate with our family members & friends from thousands of mile apart. We can travel thousands of mile distance in just few hours with aircrafts, high speed trains etc. that was not possible in past. The element that keep solving our problems connecting negatively with the human thinking is not justified.
Human thinking largely depends upon factor like quality of nutrition, quality of education and socio-economic status. In recent research the fact of having better thought processing of a person who gets better nutrition, better education and better socio-economic status is clearly corroborated. Invention of controlled fire was turning point in the evolution of technology and after that humans started using fire to cook food which has better nutrition, started using fire to illuminate the surroundings that end the limitation of human working only in day light. Step by step human started using their mind so resolve their issues and developed wheels, wooded and stone based weapons to find against adversaries, started developing tools to help in arduous works.
We all aware that electricity brought the revolution in industries in late 19th century and laid the foundation of future. It quite fascinating but the truth is that in early nineteenth century electricity was used to amuse people even this was done by the father of electricity Michael Faraday. Faraday understand the power of electricity but never succeed completely to give mathematical representation of electric and magnetic field to contemporary scientist. Maxwell observed Faraday’s experiments and formulate them into equations and Nicolas Tesla implemented them and begin the advent of science and technology. Onward technology keep flourishing and bringing revolution one by one in each and every field. With the help of technology many disease became the matter of past. Its technology that helps us to analyse the prodigious amount of data and helping us to predict the behaviors of human beings that revolutionized the production of industries. If rely on technology actually deteriorating the human thinking this era would never come.
Above examples and history of human cognitive development is enough to negate the assumption made in the sentence. Instead of impacting negatively reliance on technology has given edge to humans to by saving time in monotonous repetitive work and traveling etc. As we continue to explore and expand technology the more life will transform and this will revolutionized the human cognition. While the future is unknown, we believe in leveraging technology to create personalized approaches and solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'brings'.
Suggestion: brings
... home everything is changed. Technology bring the tremendous breakthrough in the fiel...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 675, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...speed trains etc. that was not possible in past. The element that keep solving our prob...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'understands'.
Suggestion: understands
...of electricity Michael Faraday. Faraday understand the power of electricity but never succ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Faraday) must be used with a third-person verb: 'understands'.
Suggestion: understands
...of electricity Michael Faraday. Faraday understand the power of electricity but never succ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 747, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun disease seems to be countable; consider using: 'many diseases'.
Suggestion: many diseases
...very field. With the help of technology many disease became the matter of past. Its technolo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 963, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...utionized the production of industries. If rely on technology actually deteriorati...
^^
Line 4, column 353, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'revolutionize'
Suggestion: revolutionize
... more life will transform and this will revolutionized the human cognition. While the future i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2636.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44628099174 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0446955698 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564049586777 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 837.9 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2192535023 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.608695652 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0434782609 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.47826086957 5.21951772744 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192052232509 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515115431106 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565084165688 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110178692795 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440315340847 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 100.480337079 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.